RE: brouhaha-hahaha

From: Yocum Daniel GS 21 CES/CEOE <daniel.yocum@Peterson.af.mil>
Date: Mon Apr 21 2003 - 17:10:49 EDT

I think you got my intent but you hijacked the words for your purpose
missing what I was trying to communicate. My message to you died in your
reply. See, you end up only talking to yourself again. Sure you can
mis-construe my intent of meaning and make it yours. Who owns it? Meaning
doesn't just happen, it took you to stretch my meaning so that it could
exceed the self existen (?) intent. Jim, that is not meaning that is
incoherence in comminication. It remains babel if it didn't get through.
Daniel

-----Original Message-----
From: James Rovira [mailto:jrovira@drew.edu]
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 3:01 PM
To: bananafish@roughdraft.org
Subject: Re: brouhaha-hahaha

Daniel, I didn't "hijack" your post, I repeated it. It's not my fault
your words exceeded your intent :). They always do, you know. That's
the point.

Jim

Yocum Daniel GS 21 CES/CEOE wrote:

>You missed the point. You hijacked my post, what can I say? I hope no one
>died.
>Daniel
>
>
>
>You answered your own question, Daniel, there at the end.
>
>To a hijacker, a plane "means" lethal weapon.
>
>To a traveler, a plane "means" a way to travel from one place to the next.
>
>If a hijacker takes over a plane and crashes it into a building, his
>definition wins, no?
>
>Jim
>
>-
>* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
>* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
>
>
>

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
Received on Mon Apr 21 17:10:55 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 10 2003 - 21:59:31 EDT