Hi bananafishers. I'm here on this here sunny day to present the CHamill Award for Ticking off a Bananafisher to Mort Sahl for following e-mail (read at your leisure). This is the core of my thesis, of which I have already expounded SO many times. *Nothing* I post, or I imagine, that anyone else posts, is intended to be a personal jibe. To me, everyone else on this list is a cyber-mind with whom I exchange opinions, ideas, arguments (which are different to insults) and sometimes, friendships of the pen-pal kind that only people who have never met can. If I have an idea or opinion, I vent it (e.g. sending a registered mail letter to JDS, which I still think was pretty stupid). Why would I want to personally insult someone I never met? I would hope everyone else has the same idea. And Mort, if you're going to flame someone, PLEASE at least do it publicly. Camille verona_beach@geocities.com @ THE ARTS HOLE www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442 ---------- > From: Mort Sahl <ringoworms@mailcity.com> > To: Camille Scaysbrook <verona_beach@geocities.com> > Subject: Re: Re: it didn't work > Date: Sunday, 26 April 1998 10:24 > > > > >> oh, all the letter said was "this is an attempt at getting an autograph. > >If it worked, > >> thank you". > > > >Well, that was a pretty dumb thing to do, wasn't it? No wonder Salinger's > >not on e-mail, cause there'd be *some*one out there who'd find out his > >e-mail address and spam him with stuff like that. To treat him like some > >sort of novelty or joke is to me not only puerile but rude to him as well. > >One of my favourite axioms is the one from `To Kill A Mockingbird' - `walk > >a mile in another man's shoes'. How would you like it if someone mocked you > >by sending them a letter like that? > > I would rather get something like that than an e-mail from some pissy self-important > bitch. But, I didn't get to choose. Ah. As Louis Armstrong said : `And I think to myself ... what a wonderful world' (: