---TheSecretGoldfish <lime6@rocketmail.com> wrote: > > "Old Spencer started nodding again. He also started > picking his nose. He made out like he was only pinch- > ing it, but he was really getting the old thumb right > in there. I guess he thought it was all right to do > because it was only me that was in the room. I didn't > care, except that it's pretty disgusting to watch > sombody pick their nose." > > Ch.2, Pg.9 > > as winnie-the-pooh said: "think, think, think, think," > paul. > listen to pooh bear. and think critically. it's fun. it's mental mastubation as someone called it. critical thinking. literary criticism. it's picking your nose and then trying to flick it over on the bed and missing and haveing some redgrey haired kid have to pick it up and put it on the bed. it's looking the gift horse in the mouth. and not being satisfied. cutting the horse open to see how it works. hoarding all kinds of knowledge and information about livers and intestines and the gallons per minute of the heart. it's taxidermy. rip out what's inside. fill it with fluff and mount the dead horse in your living-room to make it easier to view. so that you are not thankful when you gain a glimpse of it's movements. what use is a living horse? you can't tell what's inside without ripping it open. or you could make a dust jacket out of the hyde. or save yourself with an intestine transplant. but why would we want the horse alive. to breathe. and grow. cut and rip. cut and rip. these are the tools of literary criticism. used by critics who write critical essays on the excess of critical essay attention that salinger has received underservedly. a bunch of nose pickers. like stephen deadalus who proved algebraicly that hamlet was his own father's ghost even though he knew hamlet wasn't supposed to be didn't believe that he was. did that critic really believe that when X had tea with Esme it was a reference to a buddhist tea cerimony? mental masturbation. he got the old tip of the thumb right up there and was didgin around. "but we can use our knowledge." what happens when you take the skeleton out of the horse. sure you can count the bones. it doesn't tell you what kind of flowers or what part of the meadow that the horse liked best. all you can do with it is make some kind of frankenstien horse. a grotesque amalgamation. just a goddam monster. not a horse. just this cold thing. without any trace of the warmthe that had been there. a horse is at least human for chrissake. on second thought lets pick apart that early blooming bouquet of parentheses. and while were at it lets write fuck you by way of explanation blotting out every word salinger ever wrote. but then i can think of a smile. that was a beautiful and innocent smile. like a child. and forget these things. shall never write any salinger critisism, paul. _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com