> camille, > i can't help but point out that you are discussing only, like, the very crux > of things. 'just thought i'd mention that before computers starting blowing > up. > john The very fact that Nabokov is on record as saying that good readers `do not read books for the infantile purpose of identifying oneself with the characters, and not for the adolescent purpose of learning to live' leads me to believe that comparing Salinger and Nabokov on anything other than a purely thematic level would be pretty damn unproductive. It's kind of like comparing Picasso and da Vinci. They're both in the same field but they're doing totally different things for totally different reasons. Camille verona_beach@geocities.com @ THE ARTS HOLE http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442 @ THE INVERTED FOREST http://www.angelfire.com/pa/invertedforest