Mike wrote: > Hmm. Those words were harsh. And they provocate this: Well, they weren't meant to be. They were bemused more than anything. My response was intended to be mildly sarcastic but mostly just, like I said, bemused. Sorry if that didn't come across - and please don't use it as a reason to leave this list. I can't possibly be held responsible for all the interesting things you'd miss out on! Camille verona_beach@geocities.com @ THE ARTS HOLE http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442 @ THE INVERTED FOREST http://www.angelfire.com/pa/invertedforest > While I don't particularly care to engage in pugilism, I can't repress > defending myself here. Camille, I was completely oblivious to the fact that > you were making a rather > sportive comment. As well I found your response to be raucous and childish. > Petulance, such as this, is what makes me resent old quacks. > > I deem thee meritorious queen of ludicrous metaphors. I bow in the presence > of your royalty. Thy words give color to my monotonous life. Hail thee, > Hail thee. > > Will, I withdraw from this list.