Jason makes a nice distinction between "publishing" stories on the list and trading and sharing privately... Quickly, here's some response: I don't know all of why Mr. Salinger doesn't collect and publish his early work but he seems to not want to. I agree that one value of these early stories is that they do show a writer growing and testing characters, families, poets, and many of the elements that we understand in his pbulished bookes. There are other values (Ambrose Beers recently foregrounds RAy Ford from one of my favorites, "The INverted Forest) in the stories that make me think they are of interest and worthy of many more readers but I don't see why we can't respect Salinger's desire to let them be where they are...in the public domain in a variety of magazines still available in your libraries and micro film data banks... In his l974 NYTimes phone interview with Lacey Fosburgh, Salinger responded to an attempt to bootleg his uncollected stories by saying: "I wrote [those stories} a long time ago and I never had any intention of publishing them. I wanted them to die a perfectly natural death." "I'm not trying to hide the gaucheries of my youth, I just don't think they're worthy of publishing." Now I don't know if there's more to Salinger's thinking, especially with him seeming to publish _Hapworth_ and now hesitating, but I do respect the author doing what he thinks best with the work he has written. At least while he's alive and on this planet, I don't see why we can't respect what has given us--hurting Salinger with our human desires seems to mean we haven't read the published books well enough to learn something about basic respect and honesty... Do you think Holden would publish a bootleg version of _Out of Africa_ ? will