Henry James completely revised his early stories to match the style of his later stories, which even to me seems a tad anal-retentive (: . The thing is, I've read both the early and later versions of several of these stories and I always like the early versions better (not so many, as you expect, from Henry James, commas!) Then again, Tennessee Williams completely rewrote the third act of `Cat on A Hot Tin Roof' during its first production - and rewrote it all over again for the revival nearly twenty years later! In some ways I prefer that Salinger leaves well enough alone, because it is fascinating to dig up those early tracks ... Camille verona_beach@geocities.com @ THE ARTS HOLE http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442 @ THE INVERTED FOREST http://www.angelfire.com/pa/invertedforest > Jason makes a nice distinction between "publishing" stories on the list > and trading and sharing privately... > > Quickly, here's some response: > > I don't know all of why Mr. Salinger doesn't collect and publish his early > work but he seems to not want to. I agree that one value of these early > stories is that they do show a writer growing and testing characters, > families, poets, and many of the elements that we understand in his > pbulished bookes. There are other values (Ambrose Beers recently > foregrounds RAy Ford from one of my favorites, "The INverted Forest) in > the stories that make me think they are of interest and worthy of many > more readers but I don't see why we can't respect Salinger's desire to let > them be where they are...in the public domain in a variety of magazines > still available in your libraries and micro film data banks... > > In his l974 NYTimes phone interview with Lacey Fosburgh, Salinger > responded to an attempt to bootleg his uncollected stories by saying: > > "I wrote [those stories} a long time ago and I never had any intention of > publishing them. I wanted them to die a perfectly natural death." > > > "I'm not trying to hide the gaucheries of my youth, I just don't think > they're worthy of publishing." > > > Now I don't know if there's more to Salinger's thinking, especially with > him seeming to publish _Hapworth_ and now hesitating, but I do respect the > author doing what he thinks best with the work he has written. At least > while he's alive and on this planet, I don't see why we can't respect what > has given us--hurting Salinger with our human desires seems to mean we > haven't read the published books well enough to learn something about > basic respect and honesty... > > Do you think Holden would publish a bootleg version of _Out of Africa_ ? > > will ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com