Budding writer

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Josh Feldmeth: "Unsubscribing"
• Previous message: Rollo Rumford: "invisible ink"

--------------A24021F980DD5A53CBEA9FC6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    i dont know if i asked this before or not but, firstly, what stories
are supposed to have been written by Buddy? Secondly, to what end? why
attribute stories to him? i KNOW theres a lot in this somewhere so
please lets discuss it.
    i was wondering originally because APDFB, if 'written' by Buddy,
becomes a fictional account of Seymour's death- if written by Salinger
we know it to be a truthful account, if you see what im saying.
Therefore, it becomes a fictional account (buddy wasnt there) of the
suicide of a fictional, VOICELESS (someone used the term 'idea')
character (the elusive seymour), written by a fictional brother (buddy).

    There must be a point in all this, rather than just to prove the
point that Buddy is a writer. If that were the point, then wouldnt it
have been more important to have published some of seymours 184 poems to
prove hes a poet?
ok ta very much

--------------A24021F980DD5A53CBEA9FC6
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

• Next message: Josh Feldmeth: "Unsubscribing"
• Previous message: Rollo Rumford: "invisible ink"