RE: Tr: random gleanings from the treasure trove


Subject: RE: Tr: random gleanings from the treasure trove
ZazieZazie@hetnet.nl
Date: Thu Aug 02 2001 - 10:49:10 GMT


-- Valérie wrote:
>
> This "eye of the beholder" means you (Cecilia, I think) trust the
> masses to sentence about what is art and what is not?? In my mind,
> modern paintings show that art is now what the artist decides.

Cecilia.wrote:
No, I think that it's all subjective, on both the artist's side and the
viewer's. Artistry can take a thousand forms, but unless it is
recognized by someone as art, I don't think it can be called art.
Sometimes the person who recognizes the thing as art is the artist
himself. Sometimes it is the viewer of the piece who makes the
determination, though the creator/artist may have deemed it work.
People called Jackie Kennedy a social artist, though she just considered
it her personality. Subjective.
Therefore, if neither the artist nor any viewer considers it art, I
would say that it is not art.
Yes?

Me:
Wow, someone agrees with me!!! :) I think ...
z.

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Mon Sep 10 2001 - 15:42:12 GMT