RE: CITR and the Koran

Well, wouldn't any book be biased? You're either going to have a very
positive view of the Koran or a negative view of the Koran. At least they
chose the book that shows the Koran in a positive light, opposed to a book
that makes it out to be some terrible book in some terrible religion, and
therefore possibly brewing more anti-Islamic feelings.

>From: "Besiada, Jennifer" <Jennifer.Besiada@nextel.com>
>Reply-To: bananafish@roughdraft.org
>To: "'bananafish@roughdraft.org'" <bananafish@roughdraft.org>
>Subject: RE: CITR and the Koran
>Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 09:52:25 -0400
>
>There was an article about this in the Washington Post - it wasn't the
>Koran, it was a book by an author explaining the Koran, chapter by chapter.
>The school says they wanted to increase awareness of what is really in the
>book, not promote anything. I favor people getting more educated on things
>that are so prominent in the news, but on the other hand, from what I've
>read, the author's slant is very positive, so I don't know about using that
>particular work.
>
>Jennifer
>-
>* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
>* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
Received on Wed Aug 21 15:01:44 2002