Re: intelligence of the author vs. intelligence of the characters

From: Scottie Bowman <rbowman@indigo.ie>
Date: Tue Aug 27 2002 - 02:24:21 EDT

    '...Cecilia (the Wordsworth-hater) ...'

    ... who, I don't doubt, in her search for the divinity
    of the child would gladly shred Intimations in exchange
    for just one more page of the holy Hapworth ...

    ... who, in turn, illustrates the total folly of making
    'genius' - adult or infantile - the central figure of one's
    creative efforts. Geniuses, being by definition so far
    outside the normal human range, do not speak to our
    condition. (Except for the actual thing which virtually
    never concerns itself with fictional versions of itself.)
    One does not write a story about a unicorn when
    reflecting on the life of the pony, the dray mare
    or the stallion.

    This is fresh in my mind having watched a video of
    the Royal Tennenbaums the other night. The Glass
    echoes are obvious, of course, but the three gifted
    children are as unengaging as their chancer father
    is mildly amusing. In the same way that the gosh-
    whizzo-zowie Wise Children are essentially creatures
    from a Raree Show - rendered even more tiresome
    by that dreadful, self-regarding prose style.

    Scottie B.

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
Received on Tue Aug 27 02:24:31 2002

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 10 2003 - 20:48:48 EDT