Re: babies in the bathwater

From: James Rovira <jrovira@drew.edu>
Date: Wed Aug 13 2003 - 09:42:14 EDT

Bah. Deconstruction as a techinque of literary criticism. No wonder
you dislike it. I don't blame you. I don't think that really has very
much to do with Derrida, though, as John pointed out in previous posts
-- even provided some Derrida citations, I think.

Jim

Luke Smith wrote:

>Look, if you want, I could stop talking about a vision of Omlor's world and start talking about Omlor himself, by trying to psychoanalyze your every post (similar to what I'm doing here and here only, though less kindly). But I won't do that, because you also say things that are valuable to discussion, and I want to discuss those things instead of hurl accusations at you like "in favor of informed discussion" or "out of ignorance." Those would be fair, if the target weren't knowledgeable of Derrida and his ideas; instead, you apply these accusations to mean that you don't agree with someone else's own take on deconstructionism, even after he has been exposed extensively to this technique of literary criticism.
>
>

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
Received on Wed Aug 13 09:42:21 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 16 2003 - 00:28:15 EDT