RE: From a "disordered being"...

That is it John, I do not see you nor your fundamental nature as shit
contrary to my undeconstructed rhetoric. I see your fundamental nature as a
beautiful thing that has become marred and I see that original beautiful
nature of being as redeemable, demarrable, salvageable. When I see people I
see beauty covered in filth wearing rags (me too) but I do not accept that
state as the status quo and I believe neither do you nor Jim nor Scottie,
not Jim because he is a father who delights in his children and hopes for
the best for them, not Scottie because he spends so much time with the badly
marred trying to relieve their pain, and finally not in you who still
manages to get upset over evil and teaches in a classroom and closes his
posts with 'all the best'. So I do study shit to learn how to remove it
from our fundamental nature. Texts are important but Authors are the whys.
Daniel

-----Original Message-----
From: Omlor@aol.com [mailto:Omlor@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:56 AM
To: bananafish@roughdraft.org
Subject: Re: From a "disordered being"...

Daniel,

At last! Thanks. We finally agree on something.

You promise:

"Sorry John, I'll take up the study of shit so I may come to know about your

fundamental nature."

Yes. Not "Order." "Shit."

We are definitely getting closer.

--John

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
Received on Thu Aug 14 13:42:14 2003