Reading across the names...

Jim,

Nah, Foucault's essay is too archaeological for me. Why not use Mason and
Dixon to read Of Grammatology? For nearly 500 pages, I used One Hundred Years
of Solitude to read Glas and vice versa and had a great time doing it.

The shorthand is simply a reference to the signature. Of course the author's
intention is one aspect of the work's possible meanings, even as it is
exceeded when it encounters readers with their own determinate subject positions.

I see no problem in this.

All the best,

--John

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
Received on Thu Aug 14 15:33:01 2003