Thanks much to you two for posting that.  It's pretty 
interesting....something to think about.  The reader contributes a lot 
to the text in Tolkein's view, within guidelines provided by the 
author.  The author specifies the type of image (garden) and the reader 
provides the specific image (their mother's garden when they were 
growing up, perhaps).
I think this would work differently for different authors, of 
course...so Scottie likes Hemingway's more minimal descriptions that 
work along the lines of the Tolkein excerpt, while people who provide a 
great deal of specific detail are trying to turn literature into 
painting (by Tolkein's standards).  It's a blurry line, then, and good 
art would be separated from bad by how well the line is walked.
This would be fun to play around with using specific texts.  The 
occasional very specific detail adds quite a bit sometimes.  EVERYTHING 
being described in specific detail is too much.
I actually have that book on my shelf but haven't read more than the 
first few pages.  Too much else to read right now.
Jim
Yocum Daniel GS 21 CES/CEOE wrote:
>Specifically Jim, it is from On Fairy-Stories, the authors notes at the end of the essay.
>Daniel
>  
>
-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
Received on Wed Aug 20 13:27:40 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 16 2003 - 00:28:16 EDT