On Aug 3, 22:54, Camille Scaysbrook wrote: > Subject: Re: Glass (and Me) > > > Several times in this story, Buddy had to clarify whether he was > > addressing me, the reader, or himself, the writer. And at some > > points, it seemed as if the writer was as baffled by what was written > > as was the reader. > > Now *that* is an interesting point - some would say that that is what > Salinger has been doing for the latter half (i.e. Post Hapworth) segment of > his career - talking to himself ... It's very devious though somehow. > Taking us on this incredibly personal (seeming) journey and then going > `Well - bye!' (: ... > > > But it's the teasing (I'll call it Salinger's) that clues me in that > > at least some of the interplay (with all its inconsistencies) is > > intentional, and that, surely, the Seymore stories are a good mix of ^^^^^^^ Omigod, I can't believe I made such a big deal about Seymour and didn't even spell his name right! (Looking back on the original message, at least I was consistent.) This group showed admirable restraint in not flaming me. (Of course that could be asking for it, like the bumper sticker displayed by some brave drivers in LA: "Thank You for Not Shooting Me.") JD Hadden, have you finished _Seymour: An Introduction_ yet? I'm curious what you thought about it. Did it answer any of your questions? Did it generate more? (I think I'll read Franny and Zooey next.) -- Michael Tharp | This _---_ __ AG Communication Systems | signature /\- -/\/ \ / Phoenix, AZ | is protected = .". = _ |\ | 602-582-7113 | by an __ ` ___( | \_/ tharpm@agcs.com | attack cat. (___ (________)