On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Malcolm Lawrence wrote: > > And that's pretty much the bottom line of this thread. Paying inordinate > attention to things like race, creed, color, gender, sexual orientation, > religion, heritage and geography diverts one's attention away from the real > metaphors at play in the work and just leaves you measuring yourself up to a > visual idea rather than a visceral one. It's like that line of Seymour's from > "Franny & Zooey" that I've always loved: "...all legitimate religious study > must lead to unlearning the differences, the illusory differences, between > boys and girls, animals and stones, day and night, heat and cold." > Indeed, paying inordinate amount of attention to sociological analysis can detract from the focus of the wonder of literary techniques such as metaphors. I never meant to suggest anything different. However, that still doesn't mean that they don't matter or aren't worth writing, talking, or thinking about. I sport, perhaps the overambitious opinion that one could have enough mental energy and interest to do both. :shrugs: ......regarding your quote though, good catch. That's something I gotta do more and others on the list could do, quote the man we're all on this list for. --AK