> Seymour Glass wrote: > > "If only you'd remember before ever you sit down to write that you've > been a > > reader long before you were ever a writer. You simply fix that fact in > your > > mind, then sit very still and ask yourself, as a reader, what piece of > > writing in all the world Buddy Glass would most want to read if he had > his > > heart's choice. The next step is terrible, but so simple I can hardly > > believe it as I write it. You just sit down shamelessly and write the > thing > > yourself. I won't even underline that. It's too important to be > underlined." > > -Seymour Glass > > ..... and this is SUCH an important thing to bear in mind when reading > Salinger's fiction, expecially the later stuff. `Catcher' strikes me very > much as a book written on that ethos and which lends the book its > uniqueness and originality. The later stuff though sometimes puts me in > mind of the Brontes' Gondal saga (and Salinger is on record as being a fan > of E. Bronte) - an enormous fictional history begun in childhood with all > members of the Bronte family contributing to it, and continuing it far > beyond the age where such family games are usually discarded. Salinger has > not only sat down and written the book he wants to read, but seems to have > invented the world he would like to live in. To my mind the Glass stories > can often seem like Douglas Adams' description of the game of Brockian > Ultra Cricket - that is, a game played in a high walled enclosure so that > what is going on inside seems much more exciting for the people outside (: > A Fountain Seal'd as Christina Rossetti said; there's this inescapable > feeling with the Glasses that Salinger is getting far more out of it than > we are, and it shouldn't be like that. (That said, I'll unashamedly admit > that it's exactly the reason I started writing myself - because I couldn't > find the sort of books I'd like to read in the library - but that, perhaps > as a theatre practitioner, I am always conscious that writing should be a > communication rather than a rant into an empty phone receiver). Certainly, > writing in this manner is very much `to thine own self be true', which is > certainly one of my life axioms - and I think this is what we respond to so > warmly in Catcher - > > That's not to say I don't get a kick out of those crazy Glasses in a kind > of half-assed way (: (but the fact that I saw fit to voice that opinion in > the words of Holden Caulfield must say something, too) > > P.S. Eschewing search parties for myself (I've been back a week now and > you're all bored with me again) - where on earth is Will. How I miss his > down-to-earth denouments he gave to every argument! I am ready and willing > to send a search party out to Colorado (where, if the South Park movie is > to be believed, the war with Canada has just finished (: God that was a > funny movie) - anyone willing to don a beanie and help me? > > Camille > verona_beach@geocities.com _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com