-----Original Message----- From: Scottie Bowman <rbowman@indigo.ie> To: Bananafish <bananafish@lists.nyu.edu> Date: Saturday, August 07, 1999 7:24 AM Subject: lead, kindly light... > > There's really nothing - nothing at all - more infantile > than some petulant old man whiningly demanding one > more word. But I *do* have some remaining difficulty > with the idea of attacking the idea & not the person. > It's the old Christian injunction about hating the sin, > not the sinner. > > But is it realistic? It reminds me that an American will more freely murder his mother than admit he hates his mother or so said a European observer. Jean > > Imagine that someone had written to the list: > '... Where Salinger's really disgusting Jewishness comes out > is in his cloying obsession with family. Family, family, > family, that's all we ever hear. They're all the same, > you know. I never met a Jew yet who wasn't overawed > by his Yiddisha Momma. ...' > > This could be read as a valid comment on Salinger's writing > & the writer might be expressing his honestly held opinion > of Jews. Yet it surely demands - & would almost certainly > get - something a little more muscular AND PERSONAL > than a gentle expression of regret at the persistance in our society > of anti-semitism. None of us has a problem when the 'personal' > attack is prompted by an 'acceptable' trigger. > > But if I'M exasperated by posts with remorselessly lower case > sentences & the practice strikes me as an affectation employed > only by unoriginal & self-congratulatory writers how do I express > this exasperation without being 'personal' about those who *do* > employ it? Anti-semitism bad, sloppy writing all right, right? > > Anyway, why all this demand for kindness? It's frightfully bad > for one. The soul strengthens & flourishes in a chill climate. > I'm sure my own cheerful equanimity is largely thanks to all > the unkind treatment I've received over the years - not least > on this list. I'm endlessly grateful. > > Scottie B. > > > >