i have done very little writing, but i can say as a choreographer that what mattis described is a very similar process to what i go through as i create dances. it begins with an idea in the form of a very vague impression. the impression can be of a single dancer, a costume, a movement, or a corps of dancer in synch. i begin to play around with the idea (in my head or through movement) without giving it any conscious thought, sort of letting it take me wherever it goes. but at some point it shifts from almost a dreamlike state to being very practical. then it become very separate from me - an outside thing to mold ("this turn would be easier on my left foot than my right", "the momentum needs to shift to get from point A to point B"," what if we tried intertwined arms here"). it is very interesting to me to think of the similarities here. elizabeth ><< I have to say that I don't have the least > idea what I'm talking about, or how one can see the creative process > working in this way, yet the possibility is intriguing. > > Have fun. > > Mattis >> > >Well, you sure understood me pretty well dead on :) I think the creative >process works pretty differently for different people -- or maybe we're just >more attentive to different details of the same process. > >So in a sense this really is apples and oranges :) > >BUT, it is an eeenteresting subject. I'd like to see it developed. > >Jim