Re: the complete works

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: John Smith: "Re: John Smith"
• Previous message: John Smith: "Re: not butter, guns"
• Maybe in reply to: Scottie Bowman: "the complete works"
• Next in thread: John Smith: "Re: the complete works"

I've heard that too, but if I address the letter to an
editor and it's marked from Harold Ober and
Associates, I might be able to catch someone's eye.  I
really don't know, but it must be worth a try.  I
don't even care if I'm paid for it, the letter is a
result of my opinions and I'd like people to read it.

--- Camille Scaysbrook <c_scaysbrook@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Jim wrote:
> > That was great :) If the New Yorker doesn't pick
> it up (don't hold your 
> > breath) I'll send you some other addresses too. 
> Later tonight maybe :)
> 
> In my fond youth I considered sending some of my
> stuff there.
> Unfortunately, they only take submissions from
> agents. But hey, Jason, if
> you have one go for your life. Two thumbs up!
> 
> Camille
> verona_beach@geocities.com
> 
> 
>
_________________________________________________________
> 
> Do You Yahoo!?
> 
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com

• Next message: John Smith: "Re: John Smith"
• Previous message: John Smith: "Re: not butter, guns"
• Maybe in reply to: Scottie Bowman: "the complete works"
• Next in thread: John Smith: "Re: the complete works"