Brendan wrote: >Seymour seems a little bit interested in his little friend. I don't mean to >say >that he's a child molester, but I do think that he's idealized children so >much that he's sort of fallen in love with them, in a very adult way. This is an aspect of Salinger's work that I've always wondered about too. Last year I read an amazing novel about a paedophile and I was struck by some of the similarities between this character and some of "our" characters. (In the novel, the main character was very isolated within society, constantly disappointed with people and found his only connections that were not "phony" were with kids. He didn't have physical contact with the children he formed relationships with until one of the young people fell in love with him, they both get drunk and end up kissing. He is accused of being a child molester, admits his - "I love children" - is run out of town and commits suicide. The novel is not written by a paedophile but by a woman who worked with offenders.) I was struck by the feelings the novel invoked in me - sadness, outrage and confusion. I kept thinking about it but felt embarrassed to "admit" to anyone that I felt sympathy for a character that was based on a "child molester". I don't mean to imply that Salinger is a closet child molester or anything.It's just that some of his stories echo the same types of feelings the "child molster" described. I do think that there is a real relationship between some adults and children that is unacknowledged by most people or is regarded as sexual abuse. I don't mean sex and I don't mean love but something like "connection". And because we're not allowed to feel those things (apart from in a very sick way), characters like Mr Antolini are incredibly confusing to us. Don't know where this is all heading (it feels very dangerous to even talk about it) but I want to know what other people think. Lesley P. >---------- >