interpretations

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Brendan McKennedy: "blind faith"
• Previous message: helena kim: "muriel"

on mon 8 dec eric <EEver73319@aol.com> wrote:

> It is indeed intruiging.  I personally read Catcher for the first time > in
> English class, but had an English teacher that was more interested in > OUR (the
> class's) interpretations of the book than his own...it was a good > thing.

this reminds me of an english class i once took with a lad called
dorothy finan.

we were studying catcher at the time. she asked us what we thought about
the whole mr. antolini thing.

it was the first time in five years of secondary education that i'd been
asked my opinion on a piece of writing. you should have seen the class.
we all just sat there looking at each other. we were asked what we
thought about something and we didn't know what to do.

-- 
:helena
http://www.geocities.com/SouthBeach/4801/

• Next message: Brendan McKennedy: "blind faith"
• Previous message: helena kim: "muriel"