Helena Kim wrote: > > Dog's bollocks. > > that's funny. cause here, the dog's bollocks is (really!) something that > is absolutely great. but in the context you used it there, it seemed to > mean 'what a load of shite'. Isn't it strange how words to describe negative things so often end up describing positive things? For example - if an Australian teenager describes something as `sick' `filthy', or `mad' it all means `brilliant!' > interesting when related back to the thread we had about one > bananafishlister or another topping themselves. Yes, that was me ... and present evidence would show that I'm still here (: Camille verona_beach@geocities.com @ THE ARTS HOLE www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442 @ THE INVERTED FOREST www.angelfire.com/pa/invertedforest