We have her own incontestable word for it: I played for the >Hazel Crest Blue Jays. Coincidence? I think not.) > >Regards, >Cecilia. > Cecilia useta be a BlueJay! HOORAY! (By the way, I'm still trying to pin down the dates of my Chicago junket--so maybe we can continue this conversation over an appropriate fluid.... And I don't mean Jadot Beaujolais 1992!) >ObSal: And I'd have to say that Allie wouldn't have had a "trapper" kind of >mitt, as that's the glove reserved for beaver-coated heroines... I'd always >envisioned it as an outfielder's glove, rarely used as its owner spent so >much time dreaming. "Mixing memory and desire..." > Well, I've actually been thinking about it (in an obvious attempt to procrastinate in the face of a truly depressing MOUNTAIN of work....): In fact, I checked out CitR, and on Page 51 of the first edition knock-off that BOMC put out a few years back, JDS definitely refers to "Old Allie's baseball mitt".... Now up here in Canananada, we usually refer to fielders' gloves as just that--GLOVES.... Catchers' gloves are usually either called "trappers" or "mitts".... (Just now, I forget what we call that wierd contraption worn by first basemen....) Now, I know this is NOT conclusive, and I concede your point about dreaming outfielders (especially since you come from Chicago--where the outfielders have been doing A LOT of dreaming recently), but I'd still like to keep the possibility open that Allie was a CATCHER! (...and I'm having a GREAT time discussing baseball, SO LONG before Opening Day! Why, it isn't even Christmas yet!) Cheers, Paul