Re: American Beauty


Subject: Re: American Beauty
From: Mattis Fishman (mattis@argoscomp.com)
Date: Tue Feb 22 2000 - 12:54:53 EST


  Dear Fishes,

  I appreciate all of the comments that have followed my remarks
  about the movie, American Beauty (I, like Ed Fenning and
  most of my generation, start humming "Sugar Magnolia" at the mention of
  these words). I certainly see your points and must disqualify myself
  from further discussion due to not having actually seen the movie.
  It is obvious that a movie-viewer's impressions are shaped by much more
  than the script.

  I am sure that I had mistakenly assumed that the one-dimensional negative
  nature of the characters which struck me, would be obvious to anyone
  who had seen the file, even it had been obscured by the drama of
  the murder and the mysticism of our videoholic seer. I am more than
  willing to admit that it was a film about personal development of the
  main characters, and not about the American Dream, and even willing to
  admit that the movie does not cast its characters in the negative way
  which I perceived. This is pretty much saying that we are not discussing
  the same work, so all bets are off.

  As for the American Dream, and a paradigm outside of culture, I think
  it should be noted that it is one simply outside of *American* culture
  that is the issue. For my part, though, I do not believe that my remarks
  were at all connected to anyone's vision of this Dream, but rather
  to what I perceived was an oversimplified portrayal of failed, corrupted,
  people (and our willingness to embrace this portrayal), a perception
  which, I repeat, was not necessarily accurate.

  such a long, long time to be gone, and a short time to be here,
  all the best,
  Mattis
-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Thu Mar 02 2000 - 19:30:21 EST