Subject: Re: Consummations
From: Matt Kozusko (mkozusko@parallel.park.uga.edu)
Date: Thu Feb 17 2000 - 20:18:52 EST
"Louise Z. Brooks" wrote:
> Exactly. That's what I mean. Buddy is the `to be', Seymour is the `not to be'. [...]
Perhaps we have unwittingly exchanged rapiers. In any case, I'm not
sure who's is currently baited.
To put my thought another way: Hamlet's quandry is one of morality,
mortality, and accountability; Seymour's is one amorality,
immortality, and unavoidability. They may both ask "to be or not to
be," but they aren't asking the same question.
-- Matt Kozusko mkozusko@parallel.park.uga.edu - * Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message * UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Thu Mar 02 2000 - 19:30:22 EST