Subject: Re: Alsen's royal pain
From: LR Pearson, Arts 99 (lp9616@bristol.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Feb 04 2000 - 07:26:26 EST
On Thu, 03 Feb 2000 12:50:07 -0700 Patti Larrabee
<Patti.Larrabee@hsc.utah.edu> wrote:
> Just because someone has a room together "before the war" does not mean they were married.
> Patti
> -
The picture of Muriel and Seymour that we get from the ither stories
indicates, however, that they probably did not go away together before
the war. It's not clear where they met, but I have always assumed that
it was in the early years of the war, as Seymour would then have been
caught up in the soldiers plus young girls social gatherings. In any
case, given that Muriel's mother is confused as to why Seymour hasn't
sediuced Muriel, it seems exremely unlikely that they would have been
away for a "dirty weekend", which is probably how many people would
have perceived it in that era.
Love, Lucy-Ruth
----------------------
LR Pearson, Arts 99
lp9616@bristol.ac.uk
-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Thu Mar 02 2000 - 19:30:23 EST