Re: Cravenhearted.


Subject: Re: Cravenhearted.
From: Scottie Bowman (rbowman@indigo.ie)
Date: Wed Feb 20 2002 - 15:53:17 GMT


    First of all, there’s the simple lack of manners of someone
    who so self-absorbedly slams out onto his reader’s plate
    those great, grey turds of print. What a cheek. That’s no
    way to get my attention, buddy. Or, even, Buddy.

    And the wordy pretentiousness of little smart alecs is a joke
    of real but decidedly limited potential: enough to sustain
    a paragraph, or a page maybe – but certainly no more. For
    that really is all there is to it. To try to elevate the whole
    enterprise into a kind of borstch circuit bildungsroman won’t
    wash; that only brings us back to the Salinger Sunday school
    where tiny tots learn the meaning of goodness from Mom
    (in her various guises – other holy children, saintly Russians,
    dead brothers.)

    But of course the reason I truly loathe the story is the way it
    reminds me so much of myself: my younger self at around,
    OK not seven, but say thirteen when I started editing the school
    magazine. Or, much MUCH worse, myself nowadays when
    the night watchman has dozed off & my real self emerges
    from the sewer. There’s the same preening, the same banal
    pseudosubtlety, the same hyperadjectivitis, the same – oh Jesus –
    drollness.

    The same...

    I can’t go on.

    Scottie B.

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Wed Mar 20 2002 - 09:44:24 GMT