jim wrote: >Now, I have a question. Just what the heck **is** F and Z? We have a >fictional author--Buddy Glass--writing a "real" history (real to him, that >is). But Buddy is himself a fictional character, so his "real" history is, to >us, fiction. How do we approach this work? This reminds me of a class I took last semester where I studied Barthes a little. Is anyone more familiar with the "vanishing author" theory than I am? (We only read the Mythologies.) It seems it could have an interesting application here, not that I've done this or even thought it out very clearly. What in the stories that Buddy wrote are dependent on specifically him being the author? What if, like Barhtes said (I think), the author was not an entity that we took into account? No Buddy, no Salinger, nobody at all... ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com