RE: Godot: An Introduction

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Malcolm Lawrence: "Re: Godot: An Introduction"
• Previous message: eryk charles arthur salvaggio: "Re: BANANAFISH digest 251"

Malcolm wrote:
> Every time I think about Seymour without the glare of sentimentality
> distracting me I think, "Well, there ya go, only an idiot foolish
> enough
> to throw something at a girl because their perfection offended you
> would
> be an idiot foolish enough to take their own life and psychologically
> fuck
> up the rest of their family for the rest of their constructive lives."
> 
	Yes, yes Malcolm. I understand. It's the same as my friend
talking about looking at AIDS without sentimentality - you can do it but
it loses a lot of heart and it still doesn't make the pain go away. 
	That's why I said "a small stone" and not a great big rock - ie
the symbolism without the pain.
	And you know Malcolm, I never thought Seymour threw it because
of perfection, it was a surfeit of emotion for me.
	Lesley
	ps Hope the golf ball didn't cause too much damage.

• Next message: Malcolm Lawrence: "Re: Godot: An Introduction"
• Previous message: eryk charles arthur salvaggio: "Re: BANANAFISH digest 251"