Don't know if this was part of the discussion a while ago about proper conventions of language and posting here, but I was certainly nodding my head up and down while reading Seymour--An Introduction (if you really want to know the truth, my all time favorite Salinger text, dear tygers) when I came to the part of Buddy saying that "For that matter, it wouldn't worry him [Seymour]at all if I wrote the rest of this exclusively in lower-case letters--if my instincts advised it." Although I do tend to side with scottie in believing the conventions of language make it's communication more powerful, I think what Salinger has always said is that the rehtoric and meaning say much more than conventions can...maybe that's why he uses such an odd captitalization scheme in SAI--anyone else notice anything about Salinger's use of captitals and have any ideas about why they appear in an emotional grammar more than a standard one? will