Re: oh dear...

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Mattis Fishman: "Re: oh dear..."
• Previous message: Scottie Bowman: "oh dear..."
• Maybe in reply to: Scottie Bowman: "oh dear..."
• Next in thread: Mattis Fishman: "Re: oh dear..."

Scottie,
	Maybe on some level you were embracing the ego-lessness that it requires
to admit that you re-read your own mail after you send it ? :) An
incredible thing about email, that. How we can send our mail, and re-read
at leisure, enjoying our own word selection and sentence structure, all the
time imagining how the intended recipient will react. We all do it.


At 09:20 AM 2/5/99 +0000, you wrote:
>
>    A quick corrective, or whatever.
>
>    When I checked my 'sent' mail I was horrified 
>    to see 'the Buddhist' beneath my monniker.  
>    How it got there, I can't imagine.  
>    Left over from the clip board ?
>    Insertion from the Prince Guatama himself ?
>    Freudian slippage ?
>
>    First correct answer wins one month's free
>    analysis.
>    
>    Scottie B.
>
>

• Next message: Mattis Fishman: "Re: oh dear..."
• Previous message: Scottie Bowman: "oh dear..."
• Maybe in reply to: Scottie Bowman: "oh dear..."
• Next in thread: Mattis Fishman: "Re: oh dear..."