Re: atheism


Subject: Re: atheism
AntiUtopia@aol.com
Date: Thu Jan 20 2000 - 12:44:03 EST


In a message dated 1/20/00 9:51:58 AM Eastern Standard Time,
jjv@caesun.msd.ray.com writes:

<< It is hard to make any sense of what Derrida and his fellows are
 talking about because they completely admit to the failure of language to
 have absolute meaning. Because of deconstruction they can't really say
 anything with a straight face. I think that's why they break down and
 away from purely rational concepts. Once language is identified as
 irrational and cubist there is little sanity in trying to exchange
 rational ideas in traditional form through it.
 
 -jay >>

There are better people than me on this list to answer you, but first I'd be
careful to distinguish Derrida from other postmodern writers. He doesn't
affirm, so far as I understand him, that language has no meaning, but that an
utterance can't be tied down to one single meaning. There is a world of
difference here.

Jim
-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Mon Feb 28 2000 - 08:38:04 EST