Brendan, your "of course" attitude shows how limited a reader you really are--there are many good reasons to construct the story with an empty pool and a pushed/dead teddy, but there are enough reasons to create some very valid doubt as well. Readers who are certain of one interpretation without understanding a legitimate field of possibility may be praised for their enthusiasm, but not their wisdom. will On Sun, 4 Jan 1998, Brendan McKennedy wrote: > >In a message dated 98-01-02 12:32:49 EST, you write: > > > ><< Are you sure anyone died? >> > > > > > >Was the pool even empty?? In the story he says that it MIGHT be the day they > >were changing the water... > > > > Oh come on, folks. I enjoy the equivocation, but > let's not be silly. Of course the pool was empty, > of course Teddy died, and his sister pushed him in, >