> It is obvious that your shy attempt to coy almost led to disaster. In no such >circumstances should you allow for your past presence in high school lead to >such false assumptions. You owe an apology to the whole list, jessica. i'm afraid i cannot apologize because i am not quite sure what i am being accused of. i suppose my crime can only be that i have once again attempted to make a point about salinger and the messages i get out of his works (in addition to how they relate in my life), only to be criticized for my views. maybe i can't express myself and my ideas as well as the rest of the list, but at least i try. >Firt of all you certainly do not owe an apology to anyone. I do think >however that perhaps neither of you changed but that you justsaw each other >the way you really were instead of being weighed down by the social classes >we create in high school. I have had similiar experiences myself. Brian thank you for the defense. it is nice to know that some people can take my ideas and think about them rather than criticize me for the way i see things. i think i am inclined to agree with your theory that neither matt nor i had changed but rather saw each other in our true forms, without the prejudices we may have held in the past. thank you for reading through this. i am afraid i will henceforth be inclined to refrain from posting until i am sure that my ideas can be read, interpreted, and not misunderstood. i'm sorry if my sentence structure is wrong or hard to read. that's just the way it has always been. jessica :) *for those of you who would be inclined to complain about my writing in lower case letters might i point out that e.e. cummings tended to write in lower case letters...and i've never heard anyone accuse him of being lazy!* :)