Bananafish Archives, July, 2002
By Thread

• Introductions Amanda McKerracher (Wed Jul 03 2002 - 16:05:18 EDT)
  • Re: Introductions Matt Kozusko (Wed Jul 03 2002 - 22:03:02 EDT)
    • Re: Introductions Will Hochman (Thu Jul 04 2002 - 10:15:57 EDT)
  • Re: Introductions Will Hochman (Wed Jul 03 2002 - 17:47:01 EDT)
    • Re: Introductions Jim Rovira (Wed Jul 03 2002 - 18:34:25 EDT)
      • Re: Introductions Will Hochman (Thu Jul 04 2002 - 10:06:50 EDT)
      • Re: Introductions Jim Rovira (Thu Jul 04 2002 - 10:44:50 EDT)
      • Dream Catcher ( was Introductions) Will Hochman (Thu Jul 04 2002 - 11:58:24 EDT)
      • Re: Dream Catcher ( was Introductions) Jim Rovira (Thu Jul 04 2002 - 23:00:09 EDT)
      • Sons & Mothers Scottie Bowman (Fri Jul 05 2002 - 03:29:57 EDT)
      • Re: Sons & Mothers Tim O'Connor (Fri Jul 05 2002 - 18:52:27 EDT)
      • Re: Sons & Mothers Jim Rovira (Fri Jul 05 2002 - 09:21:35 EDT)
      • Re: Sons & Mothers AStranger2@aol.com (Fri Jul 05 2002 - 06:35:23 EDT)
      • RE: Sons & Mothers ZazieZazie@hetnet.nl (Tue Jul 09 2002 - 05:40:03 EDT)
      • RE: Sons & Mothers ZazieZazie@hetnet.nl (Mon Jul 08 2002 - 18:56:52 EDT)
      • Re: Sons & Mothers Scottie Bowman (Tue Jul 09 2002 - 02:22:49 EDT)
  • Re: Introductions Chris Kubica (Wed Jul 03 2002 - 16:11:38 EDT)
• Fwd: Dream Catcher: Underlying Theme. Will Hochman (Fri Jul 05 2002 - 12:04:05 EDT)
  • Re: Dream Catcher: Underlying Theme. Scottie Bowman (Sat Jul 06 2002 - 02:49:28 EDT)
  • Re: Fwd: Dream Catcher: Underlying Theme. Jim Rovira (Fri Jul 05 2002 - 13:21:04 EDT)
• Re: Very old response L. Manning Vines (Sat Jul 06 2002 - 01:25:37 EDT)
  • Re: Very old response L. Manning Vines (Wed Jul 03 2002 - 01:16:01 EDT)
    • Re: Very old response Jim Rovira (Wed Jul 03 2002 - 09:29:56 EDT)
• please take me off this mailing list Gene (Sat Jul 06 2002 - 03:06:10 EDT)
  • Re: please take me off this mailing list Matt Kozusko (Sat Jul 06 2002 - 05:00:08 EDT)
    • Re: please take me off this mailing list Tim O'Connor (Sat Jul 06 2002 - 22:22:59 EDT)
      • we unhappy few Scottie Bowman (Sun Jul 07 2002 - 04:50:37 EDT)
      • cheap manhoods Matt Kozusko (Sun Jul 07 2002 - 07:04:03 EDT)
      • Re: cheap manhoods Scottie Bowman (Sun Jul 07 2002 - 08:05:22 EDT)
      • Re: cheap manhoods Tim O'Connor (Sun Jul 07 2002 - 13:07:40 EDT)
      • Re: cheap manhoods Matt Kozusko (Mon Jul 08 2002 - 16:16:34 EDT)
      • Re: cheap manhoods Valerie (Mon Jul 08 2002 - 16:44:23 EDT)
      • signatures, events, contexts Matt Kozusko (Mon Jul 08 2002 - 22:10:08 EDT)
      • RE: cheap manhoods ZazieZazie@hetnet.nl (Mon Jul 08 2002 - 18:41:34 EDT)
      • Re: cheap manhoods Omlor@aol.com (Mon Jul 08 2002 - 16:56:22 EDT)
      • Re: cheap manhoods Chris Kubica (Mon Jul 08 2002 - 17:00:36 EDT)
      • Re: we unhappy few Tim O'Connor (Sun Jul 07 2002 - 05:46:39 EDT)
      • Re: we unhappy few Will Hochman (Mon Jul 08 2002 - 12:48:22 EDT)
      • RE: we unhappy few ZazieZazie@hetnet.nl (Mon Jul 08 2002 - 18:28:07 EDT)
      • RE: we unhappy few ZazieZazie@hetnet.nl (Mon Jul 08 2002 - 12:57:03 EDT)
      • Re: we unhappy few Valerie (Mon Jul 08 2002 - 16:33:43 EDT)
      • nice detail, robbie... Jim Rovira (Sun Jul 07 2002 - 00:11:17 EDT)
      • Re: nice detail, robbie... L. Manning Vines (Sun Jul 07 2002 - 16:07:07 EDT)
      • Re: nice detail, robbie... Jim Rovira (Sun Jul 07 2002 - 20:15:16 EDT)
      • Re: nice detail, robbie... Will Hochman (Mon Jul 08 2002 - 12:59:22 EDT)
      • Re: nice detail, robbie... Jim Rovira (Mon Jul 08 2002 - 13:28:44 EDT)
      • Re: nice detail, robbie... L. Manning Vines (Mon Jul 08 2002 - 23:54:31 EDT)
      • Re: nice detail, robbie... Jim Rovira (Tue Jul 09 2002 - 09:39:26 EDT)
      • Re: nice detail, robbie... Jim Rovira (Wed Jul 10 2002 - 22:46:40 EDT)
      • Re: nice detail, robbie... L. Manning Vines (Wed Jul 10 2002 - 01:02:02 EDT)
      • Re: nice detail, robbie... Jim Rovira (Wed Jul 10 2002 - 09:16:49 EDT)
      • Re: nice detail, robbie... Will Hochman (Wed Jul 10 2002 - 10:09:24 EDT)
      • Re: nice detail, robbie... Jim Rovira (Wed Jul 10 2002 - 10:48:10 EDT)
      • Book of J Cecilia Baader (Wed Jul 10 2002 - 21:25:07 EDT)
      • Re: Book of J Jim Rovira (Wed Jul 10 2002 - 21:48:04 EDT)
      • Re: Book of J Cecilia Baader (Wed Jul 10 2002 - 22:14:59 EDT)
      • Re: Book of J Jim Rovira (Wed Jul 10 2002 - 22:55:51 EDT)
      • The business of subjects (Administrative Trivia) Tim O'Connor (Wed Jul 10 2002 - 08:33:09 EDT)
      • Re: The business of subjects (Administrative Trivia) Matt Kozusko (Wed Jul 10 2002 - 10:31:30 EDT)
      • RE: The business of subjects (Administrative Trivia) Raley, Amber (Wed Jul 10 2002 - 10:05:40 EDT)
      • Re: The business of subjects (Administrative Trivia) Will Hochman (Wed Jul 10 2002 - 09:49:47 EDT)
      • Re: The business of subjects (Administrative Trivia) Tim O'Connor (Wed Jul 10 2002 - 12:03:58 EDT)
      • Re: The business of subjects (Administrative Trivia) BookBritt99@aol.com (Mon Jul 22 2002 - 07:15:43 EDT)
      • web letters Will Hochman (Mon Jul 22 2002 - 10:09:41 EDT)
      • Re: web letters Scottie Bowman (Mon Jul 22 2002 - 13:59:17 EDT)
      • Re: The business of subjects (Administrative Trivia) Jim Rovira (Mon Jul 22 2002 - 09:15:11 EDT)
      • Re: The business of subjects (Administrative Trivia) Tim O'Connor (Mon Jul 22 2002 - 11:33:32 EDT)
      • Re: The business of subjects (Administrative Trivia) Jim Rovira (Mon Jul 22 2002 - 11:58:35 EDT)
      • RE: The business of subjects (Administrative Trivia) ZazieZazie@hetnet.nl (Mon Jul 22 2002 - 07:00:16 EDT)
    • Re: please take me off this mailing list Gene (Sat Jul 06 2002 - 05:19:41 EDT)
• Covers The Fantastic Majorette (Mon Jul 01 2002 - 18:54:39 EDT)
  • RE: Covers ZazieZazie@hetnet.nl (Mon Jul 08 2002 - 18:44:15 EDT)
• RE: LMF ZazieZazie@hetnet.nl (Mon Jul 08 2002 - 14:12:18 EDT)
• RE: R.W.B. Lewis Obituary mentions Salinger ZazieZazie@hetnet.nl (Mon Jul 08 2002 - 17:02:53 EDT)
  • chagrin d'amour Scottie Bowman (Mon Jul 08 2002 - 18:18:29 EDT)
    • RE: chagrin d'amour ZazieZazie@hetnet.nl (Mon Jul 08 2002 - 19:05:53 EDT)
• RE: Dream Catcher ZazieZazie@hetnet.nl (Mon Jul 08 2002 - 17:10:50 EDT)
• RE: Sun Also Rises and "Six." ZazieZazie@hetnet.nl (Mon Jul 08 2002 - 17:30:41 EDT)
• RE: Cheever and Salinger and Six again ZazieZazie@hetnet.nl (Mon Jul 08 2002 - 18:32:43 EDT)
• So Long, List! Chris Kubica (Wed Jul 10 2002 - 11:33:25 EDT)
  • Re: So Long, List! Jim Rovira (Wed Jul 10 2002 - 14:12:52 EDT)
• The Holy Moment Josh Kitching (Tue Jul 09 2002 - 17:43:36 EDT)
  • Re: The Holy Moment Will Hochman (Wed Jul 10 2002 - 10:11:26 EDT)
  • Re: The Holy Moment Josh Kitching (Wed Jul 10 2002 - 17:30:30 EDT)
    • Re: The Holy Moment Jim Rovira (Wed Jul 10 2002 - 18:02:03 EDT)
• Intent to Post L. Manning Vines (Thu Jul 11 2002 - 01:06:36 EDT)
  • Re: Intent to Post Jim Rovira (Thu Jul 11 2002 - 09:20:43 EDT)
  • Re: Intent to Post Will Hochman (Thu Jul 11 2002 - 08:57:35 EDT)
• now we know Scottie Bowman (Thu Jul 11 2002 - 08:40:17 EDT)
  • Re: now we know Jim Rovira (Thu Jul 11 2002 - 09:31:29 EDT)
    • Re: now we know Tim O'Connor (Thu Jul 11 2002 - 09:53:36 EDT)
      • Re: now we know Jim Rovira (Thu Jul 11 2002 - 12:40:45 EDT)
  • Re: now we know Will Hochman (Thu Jul 11 2002 - 09:16:21 EDT)
  • Re: now we know Matt Kozusko (Thu Jul 11 2002 - 11:15:27 EDT)
    • Re: now we know Will Hochman (Fri Jul 12 2002 - 10:40:28 EDT)
      • Re: now we know midge immington (Fri Jul 12 2002 - 12:09:27 EDT)
  • Re: now we know Patrick Wong (Thu Jul 11 2002 - 19:01:31 EDT)
• a very fine establishment Scottie Bowman (Thu Jul 11 2002 - 16:42:43 EDT)
  • Re: a very fine establishment Jim Rovira (Thu Jul 11 2002 - 17:42:33 EDT)
  • Re: a very fine establishment Tim O'Connor (Thu Jul 11 2002 - 18:09:45 EDT)
  • Re: an establishment Matt Kozusko (Thu Jul 11 2002 - 23:00:02 EDT)
    • Re: an establishment Scottie Bowman (Fri Jul 12 2002 - 03:02:37 EDT)
      • Re: an establishment Jim Rovira (Fri Jul 12 2002 - 09:12:24 EDT)
      • Re: an establishment Matt Kozusko (Fri Jul 12 2002 - 21:24:59 EDT)
• subscribing instructions Kim Johnson (Fri Jul 12 2002 - 17:45:45 EDT)
  • Re: subscribing instructions Tim O'Connor (Fri Jul 12 2002 - 18:38:54 EDT)
• by way of introduction Kim Johnson (Fri Jul 12 2002 - 15:03:52 EDT)
  • Re: by way of introduction KATHERINE WHEELER (Sat Jul 13 2002 - 23:34:46 EDT)
    • Re: by way of introduction Kim Johnson (Mon Jul 15 2002 - 11:51:09 EDT)
      • Re: by way of introduction Kim Johnson (Mon Jul 15 2002 - 12:28:39 EDT)
  • Re: by way of introduction L. Manning Vines (Mon Jul 15 2002 - 21:32:11 EDT)
• Christianity in the West [was: RE: Cheever and Salinger and Six again] L. Manning Vines (Mon Jul 15 2002 - 01:15:14 EDT)
• Sacred Text Web Site Will Hochman (Tue Jul 16 2002 - 09:56:26 EDT)
  • Re: Sacred Text Web Site Josh Kitching (Tue Jul 16 2002 - 17:10:28 EDT)
    • Re: Sacred Text Web Site Kim Johnson (Wed Jul 17 2002 - 11:59:03 EDT)
  • Re: Sacred Text Web Site Jim Rovira (Tue Jul 16 2002 - 10:13:27 EDT)
  • Re: Sacred Text Web Site Jim Rovira (Tue Jul 16 2002 - 10:10:06 EDT)
• Catcher, published in 1951, turns 51 today. Raley, Amber (Tue Jul 16 2002 - 11:22:24 EDT)
  • Re: Catcher, published in 1951, turns 51 today. midge immington (Tue Jul 16 2002 - 16:39:56 EDT)
• holden, et al. vs. the glasses Kim Johnson (Wed Jul 17 2002 - 12:07:10 EDT)
  • Re: holden, et al. vs. the glasses Josh Kitching (Thu Jul 18 2002 - 17:28:45 EDT)
  • Re: holden, et al. vs. the glasses L. Manning Vines (Wed Jul 17 2002 - 19:21:13 EDT)
    • Re: holden, et al. vs. the glasses Kim Johnson (Thu Jul 18 2002 - 11:41:07 EDT)
      • Re: holden, et al. vs. the glasses Jim Rovira (Thu Jul 18 2002 - 14:02:08 EDT)
      • Re: holden, et al. vs. the glasses Kim Johnson (Thu Jul 18 2002 - 15:20:55 EDT)
      • Hapless or Worthless? Matt Kozusko (Fri Jul 19 2002 - 05:55:59 EDT)
      • Re: Hapless or Worthless? meghan is amazing (Sat Jul 20 2002 - 11:43:08 EDT)
      • Re: Hapless or Worthless? BookBritt99@aol.com (Fri Jul 19 2002 - 17:31:27 EDT)
      • Re: Hapless or Worthless? Jim Rovira (Fri Jul 19 2002 - 19:26:40 EDT)
      • Re: Hapless or Worthless? Jim Rovira (Fri Jul 19 2002 - 19:28:11 EDT)
      • Re: Hapless or Worthless? Josh Kitching (Fri Jul 19 2002 - 17:15:50 EDT)
      • Re: Hapless or Worthless? L. Manning Vines (Sun Jul 21 2002 - 18:15:47 EDT)
      • Re: Hapless or Worthless? Josh Kitching (Sat Jul 27 2002 - 23:40:40 EDT)
      • Re: Hapless or Worthless? Jim Rovira (Sun Jul 28 2002 - 00:17:13 EDT)
      • Re: Hapless or Worthless? Jason McHenry (Sat Jul 27 2002 - 23:25:33 EDT)
• later salinger Kim Johnson (Wed Jul 17 2002 - 14:27:52 EDT)
  • Re: later salinger Will Hochman (Wed Jul 17 2002 - 21:35:16 EDT)
    • Re: later salinger Kim Johnson (Thu Jul 18 2002 - 11:36:14 EDT)
  • Re: later salinger Kim Johnson (Wed Jul 17 2002 - 17:28:06 EDT)
• Hapless or Worthless? Matt Kozusko (Fri Jul 19 2002 - 11:55:43 EDT)
• (no subject) meghan is amazing (Sun Jul 21 2002 - 13:13:39 EDT)
  • (no subject) meghan is amazing (Sat Jul 27 2002 - 23:52:00 EDT)
• Responses L. Manning Vines (Mon Jul 15 2002 - 01:11:49 EDT)
  • Re: Responses Jim Rovira (Mon Jul 15 2002 - 09:54:23 EDT)
  • Re: Responses Scottie Bowman (Mon Jul 15 2002 - 03:22:27 EDT)
  • Re: Responses L. Manning Vines (Fri Jul 19 2002 - 23:54:46 EDT)
  • Re: Responses L. Manning Vines (Fri Jul 19 2002 - 23:52:27 EDT)
    • Re: Responses Jim Rovira (Sat Jul 20 2002 - 08:26:06 EDT)
  • Re: Responses L. Manning Vines (Tue Jul 16 2002 - 20:07:41 EDT)
    • Re: Responses Jim Rovira (Wed Jul 17 2002 - 19:45:08 EDT)
  • Re: Responses L. Manning Vines (Mon Jul 15 2002 - 21:30:37 EDT)
    • Re: Responses Jim Rovira (Tue Jul 16 2002 - 10:23:14 EDT)
    • Re: Responses Jim Rovira (Tue Jul 16 2002 - 10:09:26 EDT)
  • Re: Responses L. Manning Vines (Mon Jul 15 2002 - 21:19:31 EDT)
  • Re: Responses L. Manning Vines (Mon Jul 15 2002 - 20:35:05 EDT)
  • Re: Responses L. Manning Vines (Sun Jul 21 2002 - 17:48:37 EDT)
  • Re: Responses L. Manning Vines (Mon Jul 29 2002 - 00:03:14 EDT)
    • Re: Responses Jim Rovira (Mon Jul 29 2002 - 09:25:38 EDT)
• Chaim Potok Tim O'Connor (Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:00:09 EDT)
  • Re: Responses Jim Rovira (Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:57:09 EDT)
  • Re: Chaim Potok L. Manning Vines (Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:58:29 EDT)
  • Re: Chaim Potok VacumKitty@aol.com (Wed Jul 24 2002 - 00:51:38 EDT)
• previous message L. Manning Vines (Sat Jul 27 2002 - 16:47:49 EDT)
  • Re: previous message Jim Rovira (Sat Jul 27 2002 - 19:23:01 EDT)
• the Oops L. Manning Vines (Sat Jul 27 2002 - 17:00:46 EDT)
  • Re: the Oops Tim O'Connor (Sat Jul 27 2002 - 20:08:54 EDT)

Last message date: Mon Jul 29 2002 - 09:26:02 EDT
Archived on: Tue Sep 17 2002 - 16:27:02 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Sep 17 2002 - 16:27:02 EDT