Matt Kozusko wrote: > > Bridget C wrote: > > > > this is how we're sure that allie is real: > [excerpt from _Catcher_ cut] > > I have just sent a post about this, so I won't go into detail, but: if > you're suggesting that we know Allie is real because Phoebe indicates > that he is real, you're missing my point. If one wants really to > interrogate the subject of Holden's sanity, one has to question the > "veracity" of *everything* in his narrative, including the points at > which he represents conversations between himself and his sister. > > -- > Matt Kozusko mkozusko@parallel.park.uga.edu i think that "[questioning] the veracity of everything" is taking a text too literal. if you do that, you're not paying attention to the characters... sure, it's possible that nothing is true in the entire book, everything is a complete illusion of a teenager in therapy. but if you examine holden's character, you'll see he has no reason to make up conversations with his sister, or people, or anything unless you believe he is crazy. so, in my opinion, going back to the text for evidence of something in this book is okay because of what we know about holden... to him, that kind of lying is not okay. and is his sanity really relevant to honesty? even if a reader thought he was crazy, they would still have to keep in mind his good nature.