-----Original Message----- From: Matt Kozusko <mkozusko@parallel.park.uga.edu> To: bananafish@lists.nyu.edu <bananafish@lists.nyu.edu> Date: Sunday, July 12, 1998 11:47 PM Subject: Beats me. >Patrick Flaherty wrote, regarding my recent post: > >> Is it really that important to declare Salinger a Beat or a non-Beat? > >Perhaps not, but, after careful scrutiny of the post you quoted, I cannot find >any mention there of this issue whatsoever. > >> _Catcher_ is, in my mind, the greatest book ever written. > >The greatest book ever? What are your criteria? > > -- >Matt Kozusko mkozusko@parallel.park.uga.edu > Literature, in my opinion, should be judged first on the amount of pleasure one gets from the reading of it. As readers, we should also consider the works' intensity and, in a sense, the effect it has on our own lives. I realize that by declaring _Catcher_ "the greatest book" I have set myself up for some well-justified scrutiny. However, every time I pick the book up I am given a new glimpse at what I feel to be brilliance. What issue would you like me to address? Patrick Flaherty