Yes G, the connection to _MaoII_ is quite strong, and the photo was published on the front page of the NY Post on April 21, l988. will On Thu, 23 Jul 1998, Kay/Bill Burbidge wrote: > wishy@nettaxi.com wrote: > > > > >Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 10:31:50 +1000 > > >From: Camille Scaysbrook <verona_beach@geocities.com> > > > > >> Hmmm.....I thought there would be some list activity on this thread..... > > > > >I certainly would be a lot more excited if I saw the great JD in the flesh > > >(granted, the last picture I ever saw of him was in about 1953 so I > > >probably wouldn't recognise him unfortunately ...) how would I have been > > >able to resist not giving him my laptop and saying ... buddy, this is for a > > >lot of things ... (: > > > > Have you never seen the -angry- pic, then? Dunno who took it and for > > what paper, but it must have been within the last few years ('cause > > he's changed some). Certainly I've seen it within the last few years. > > >From (poor) memory, an angry old geezer, clearly unwilling to be > > photographed, just about to attack the photographer. > > > > Sad and a little bit funny at the same time - you know, it's probably > > what he would have wanted. > > The picture to which you are refering is a new york post (I'm 95% sure > on this one) photo from about, oh, 6 to eight years ago. The story goes > as follows. JD had not been photographed in quite some time so the arts > editor told 2 photographers to get a shot of him ,at all costs. They > followed him for quite some time, hid around a corner while he bought > groceries. when he came out of the store they popped up from around the > corner and got the incriminating photo. He thought he was being shot > at, just about had a heart attack. > > The photo made the front page of the new york times > > A little subplot here, Don DeLillo was so disgusted it gave him the > premise for Mao II, which he said in an interview in germany was based > on the famed photo. > > G. >