Matt Kozusko wrote: > JDHadden@aol.com wrote: > > > Its a lot easier to > > say that you prefer Ulysses to The Fountainhead because it's simply more > > entertaining (which it's not, but that's just an example...) > > Oh, but it is. And that's where scholarship is useful. I can prove > that _Ulysses_ is more entertaining than _The Fountainhead_. > > To begin with, I have a scholarly list of the top 100 books of the > century. _Ulysses_ ranks number 1, while _The Fountainhead_ isn't even > included. > > And last night, I conducted a scholarly experiement. I'm not sure my > procedures (control groups and whatnot) would meet the standards implied > by Dr. Frye, but there's no arguing with the results: on the average, I > laugh out loud roughly 4 times every two pages of _Ulysses_ (that's 4.8 > times in the Gabler edition) and drop the book in sheer hysterics about > twice every 50 pages (2.4, Gabler). By contrast, _The Fountainhead_ > causes me to swear out loud roughly 6 times every 2 sentences and to try > to flush the book down the toilet about 5 times each chapter. Literature is not sports. Who cares? Malcs