I have an idea Mirjam & Rick threw this ball initially in my direction. I was slightly reluctant to pick it up. First, the beauty of women's hair makes a powerful appeal to my own sensuality. It's not exactly of fetishistic strength but after registering a girl's face & its expression she wears upon it, my own eyes certainly travel to her hair - long before they proceed anywhere else. Yes. Yes... Delicious. It would be all too easy & enjoyable, as you can see, to embark on a Leporello list of : 'Blondes who loved me ...' & so on. And second, I was reluctant to be drawn onto the old Freudian roundabout where we start pontificating about the power of the fetish to allay castration anxiety - & all that balls. There may - or may not be - a valid unconscious basis to all this but that seems to me to be only relevant to the situation of Salinger talking to his therapist. And not to whatever symbolic or metaphorical meaning may apply in any particular story of his. I'm not sufficiently au fait with the works to consider how often Salinger concerns himself with the hair of his women as compared with that of his men. Before the recent posts, I would have been able offhand to mention only Holden's lightning flash. For what it's worth, I always regarded this as Holden's mark of distinction even, perhaps, of divine favour & suffering. Like a stigma. Let me think some more about all this. It's certainly more my bag than the Fathers of the Church. I have to admit it. Anyway, I can hear Paul banging on the studio door demanding his own air time on this thrilling new topic. Scottie B.