spheres of influence?


Subject: spheres of influence?
From: Jive Monkey (monkey_jive@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Jun 16 2001 - 14:13:59 GMT


All true, beautifully true, especially the bit about NAVSP. But I think you
have to throw in the Germans and the Brits when discussing the imperial rape
of China (and there was a fourth, [and a fifth?] I can't remember who.
Portugal? France? Spain? Belgium?). I was going to mention the
not-exactly-neutral Irish downed pilot policy myself, but left it out to
keep my note short.

Thanks for the support
Ringo

From: "Scottie Bowman" <rbowman@indigo.ie>
Reply-To: bananafish@roughdraft.org
To: <bananafish@roughdraft.org>
Subject: more history
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 18:47:03 +0100

     Ringo,

     I had in mind more the technique of fire storm which
     was certainly first visited on Hamburg by Bomber Command
     on the night of July 27/28 1943 (‘’the first firestorm
     of the Second World War’’ - David Irving: The Destruction
     of Dresden.) It was repeated at Dresden in February 1945
     - when, you’re quite right, the Ist Air Division of the USAF
     extended during day the destruction that had been started
     by the RAF at night.

     The neutrality of Ireland was a very particular kind of neutrality.
     The rate of unemployment then was such that rather more
     men volunteered (even per head of population) for the British
     forces than came from Northern Ireland - which was technically
     at war with Germany alongwith the rest of the United Kingdom
     but where conscription did not operate. The use of the southern
     ports were certainly denied to the Royal & US Navies;
     but Allied pilots, for example, who crashed in Ireland were
     surreptitiously returned to England whilst (the rather greater number
     of) Luftwaffe chaps who were shot down on Irish territory were kept
     safely locked up in the Curragh Internment camp. It’s true that
     from time to time rumours ran round that the Americans were
     about to invade southwards & preparations made to repel them;
     but I’ve just been reading the war diaries of Alanbrooke the British
     CIGS in which he details the friendly, confidential & mutually
     admiring discussions he had been enjoying with his oppo,
     the Chief of Staff of the Irish Army.

     I lived in Ireland as a wide awake young adolescent in those days
     & Zazie’s characterisation of my Irish friends as Nazi sympathisers
     struck me as deeply uninformed & more than a little presumptuous.

     With its faults, most objective commentators would regard India
     as a very real functioning democracy - which its founders, in their
     generosity, always accepted as a legacy of the Raj. And, of couse,
     it stands up rather well - as do even Pakistan & Bangladesh - against
     the comparison of China (for so long a child of the American
     imperium.) There were many, many diners at the Middle Eastern
     table. I don’t think the Brits can be made to carry that particular
     can unassisted.

     On another tack, I should like to align myself unreservedly with
     your own, less mystical, view of characters who enjoy pawing
     their juniors. Pity about The Obvious. The damned wings keep
     falling off & that mystical gaze can be so easily mistaken by
     the unreverential for cross eyes.

     And yes, you bastid, you beat me to it - NAVSP. I thought of it
     all right, but OK, it’s a fair cop.

     Scottie B.

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Jul 24 2001 - 09:20:44 GMT