Re: Re[2]: EW and recluses


Subject: Re: Re[2]: EW and recluses
Hotspur8@aol.com
Date: Mon Jun 30 1997 - 16:52:59 GMT


In a message dated 97-06-29 21:48:24 EDT, you write:

<< <<What do you make of the fact that KMart is sponsoring the tour?>>
 
  <<<<>I think it's a very whimsical way of U2 acknowledging that their
 competition, Wal-Mart, is in fact the devil.<>>>>
 
>..which inturn would make u2 the devil, right? the idea of the reciprocal
>effect?
 
 I was being facetious. I mean, it's only rock and roll. Doesn't matter who
 sponsors it anymore. Move out of clubland and it becomes the logical
 extension of the circus, now, innit? Any resemblance to rebellion was lost
 ages ago. It's all just about hype anymore, and a perfectly lucrative way
 to make a living if you'd rather fit in with the people who wear tattoos
 rather than the people who wear coats and ties.
>>

that still doesn't change the fact that the possiblity exists that the devil
has incarnated himself in the forms of kmart and u2..
did you by chance notice the rather oprtune spot that they held that press
conference at tthat kmart at the announcement of the concert concept and
scheduling dates-- right in front of some kmart lingerie hanging in what i'm
sure is a rather large selection of quality clothing goods. hmmm.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Mon Oct 09 2000 - 15:02:01 GMT