>From owner-bananafish@lists.nyu.edu Mon Jun 8 09:07:00 1998 >Received: from localhost (server@LOCALHOST) > by acf3.nyu.edu (PMDF V5.1-10 #24942) > with SMTP id <0EU80015NQ0HK4@acf3.nyu.edu>; Mon, > 8 Jun 1998 12:05:06 -0400 (EDT) >Received: from escape.com (holden@escape.com) > by acf3.nyu.edu (PMDF V5.1-10 #24942) > with ESMTP id <0EU800N7TPZMQ7@acf3.nyu.edu> for bananafish@lists.nyu.edu; Mon, > 08 Jun 1998 12:04:36 -0400 (EDT) >Received: (from holden@localhost) by escape.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) id MAA18072; Mon, > 08 Jun 1998 12:01:57 -0400 (EDT) >Date: Mon, 08 Jun 1998 12:01:55 -0400 (EDT) >From: Andrew Charles Kennis <holden@escape.com> >Subject: JDS and Hollywood don't mix..... >In-reply-to: <0EU600JHP8T1RS@acf3.nyu.edu> >Sender: owner-bananafish@lists.nyu.edu >To: bananafish@lists.nyu.edu >Reply-to: bananafish@lists.nyu.edu >Message-id: <Pine.BSI.3.91.980608115917.16683A-100000@escape.com> >MIME-version: 1.0 >Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII >Precedence: bulk >X-Listprocessor-version: 7.2 -- ListProcessor by CREN > > > >On Sun, 7 Jun 1998, Scottie Bowman wrote: > >> >> Why make films of Salinger's works at all ? >> > >God knows why......we've had this discussion many times, and I've always >felt it would be a truly sad day when and if a JDS book was ever >Hollywood'ized. It's certainly not a good idea, for many of the reasons >you listed in your post, and secondly it would seem awfully contradictory >to the Salinger philosophy in general to 'go Hollywood'. > >--AK > >What about a very non-hollywood film? > ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com