Subject: Re: Reclusion?
From: Benjamin Samuels (madhava@sprynet.com)
Date: Wed Mar 22 2000 - 16:06:01 EST
> I'm sorry if it came off as a flippant response. What I meant was that
> it is a riddle of sorts, something we will have a hard time answering,
> assuming that it can be answered at all.
Isn't it funny how hard it is to judge how what you write will be recieved,
and also how to recieve what others write? I didn't take it as flippant- I
extend the benefit of the doubt at all times, as much as possible. Like
that reverse paranoia of Seymour I suspect the world of scheming to make me
happy, and all people of having good intentions. I worry a little sometimes
that the liberty of voice these suspicians allow me to presume might get
taken the wrong way by others who work with a different set of suspicians
about others. Anyway Purity of intent is most important and will eventually
see through any misuderstandings. Back to Salinger- I guesse it is a riddle,
something that will retain it's sense of mystery yet. No harm in wondering
though. Thanks, Tim, for the bio info.
Take care
Love,
Madhava
-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sat Apr 01 2000 - 10:11:40 EST