RE: Try listening to the real ideas and ignore vitriolic attacks

I've offered quite a few specific answers to your question, actually,
even one recently, I think. They mostly revolve around the ideas that
texts are multivocal and not univocal, and that insisting on authorial
intent is to insist upon one meaning...

Responding to you and Daniel, yes, John O. did respond a few times with
specific content about the deconstruction issue. Not as much as I did,
though.
Jim

It's an attitude of the soul Jim, one hears himself regardless of what is
laid before his eyes and others strain to hear the voice of the other. I
have already rummaged around this attic and I turn to Other landscapes, you
know the stuff. Yea I know some writers write it that way but I for one get
sick of sugar pretty easily and look forward to meat and John O's brazen
'let 'em eat cake' only stirs the pot. Yea the hip modern groove is the
'inner space' thing, hey you can stay stuck back in the '60's with Jim
Morris banging on those doors some of us prefer, at least now days, the path
less traveled by. Not because we are a bunch of James Deans but because the
20th century experiments just don't wash.

Daniel

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
Received on Wed Mar 5 11:04:39 2003