Re: try the real ideas

Critiquing Derrida as a proponent of relativism is a misunderstanding :).

I'm not much of a relativist myself, so when I see good observations I
try to make sure I understand them.

Jim

Yocum Daniel GS 21 CES/CEOE wrote:

>Perfect reflection of your opening sentence, which was perfectly true
>all around, of course.
>
>They taint experients, theyse observshuns :)
>
>Jim
>
>That's it, 'observations', it's all subjective, you have proven that... to
>yourself, since God knows your assumptions are rock solid. Crucified
>yourself at the ordinates of your Cartesian universe. Every measurement
>that I know of requires two reference points at a minimum the rest is jetsam
>and flotsam (sometimes beautiful or flavorful like cake). Derrida's
>allegiances aside (not your allegiance to Derrida, don't go pouring yourself
>in to quickly it's not a void) it's betwixt the two that it all resides.
>Between the two datum. Go ahead and make yourself one we can't help that
>often, and some never, but you have to lay down the needle, hash pipe, or
>bong sometime, you know perfectly well, especially when you look both ways
>to cross the street or just as your mouse clicks on that in box line. That
>is the problem with demons, they have no body of their own they have to
>possess another and that ain't a relationship.
>
> Daniel
>
>

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
Received on Wed Mar 5 11:55:08 2003