> piece of writing. Gimmicks are always gimmicks, but it is a writer's > job to find the Best way to tell a story. The reader will know if it's > a gimmick or not. In Slaughterhouse Five, Vonnegut didn't *need* to > write certain things in his own handwriting to conceal the ineptness of > his writing, but he did because it helped create the atmosphere of a > WWII prisoner camp outhouse where all the Americans puked like pigs > while the Brits and Germans looked on, disgusted. Vonnegut + Slaughterhouse-Five = inept writing? I'm sure I must have missed something in this logical train of thought, because this is perhaps Vonnegut's most emotionallly wrenching novel. There's not a day that passes when I don't see an echo of his story in my daily life (getting crushed into a subway train, feeling that I'm occasionally the victim of random circumstances, even imagining how to talk to a Tralfamadorian!). --tim