I was reminded of the whole capitals argument today in a lecture on writing of the English Renaissance, in which abstract entities such as Fate and Fortune were capitalized to make them into personifications. In relation to Salinger, I think this is relevant, turning a word into an entity called that by that word - thus `soon' becomes an entity called `Soon' - be that a state of mind or whatever. It has the effect of opening the word or phrase up to a new meaning by encompassing many things under that `entity' - it becomes a metonym rather than a word or phrase with only one meaning. This also ties in very nicely with Salinger's Buddhist interests, one of the main axioms of which is `No reliance on words' - obviously a conundrum for a writer ! - the implication being that words are far to broad to express the smaller subtleties and complexities of the universe. I believe that through his capitalization, Salinger in effect is trying to defeat this conundrum of the narrowness of words by turning them into entities or concepts. P.S. I'm new to Bananafish (I'm an Australian student at Sydney University) so please give me a Warm Welcome and a late-blooming bunch of parentheses. (: Camille